What is not mentioned in the famous article by Edmund Gettier

The paper aims to unfold the «internal» content of Gettier’s argument as a skeptical against knowledge in terms answering question: «why he could be right when says what says». Our initial hypothesis is that E. Gettier does not say anything about «accidentality fact Smith has 10 coins his pocket», but uses words «entailment» and «deduction», which substantiates «truth conclusion», on basis attributes «knowledge» Smith. article comes out at certain time, rhetoric necessary sufficient conditions, with regard justification an analogue closure principle given, there are exactly two examples – all this lead assumption «justification» form speaks it staging part logical relationship between beliefs interconnected by entailment fixed same way person’s belief system. Much evidence pages three illustration why «logical interpretation» reasoning doesn’t work. Contrary most popular points view, managed show only implementation formal relations allow one get defines it. In particular, such reading makes possible block various attempts propose «fourth condition». It must meet task set restore confidence fulfillment can help «knowledge». However, within framework linguistic turn paradigm, works, impossible, because general, simply lacks adequate means discussing persuasiveness inference. sense, is, definition, fuzzy concept brings us back «classical notions» implies validity, also soundness, relevance, usefulness.